The Top Ten Daily Consequences of Having Evolved
From hiccups to wisdom teeth, the evolution of homo sapiens has left behind some glaring, yet innately human, imperfections
- By Rob Dunn
- Smithsonian.com, November 19, 2010, Subscribe
From hiccups to wisdom teeth, our own bodies are worse off than most because of the differences between the wilderness in which we evolved and the modern world in which we live. The Print Collector / Corbis
Natural selection acts by winnowing the individuals of each generation, sometimes clumsily, as old parts and genes are co-opted for new roles. As a result, all species inhabit bodies imperfect for the lives they live. Our own bodies are worse off than most simply because of the many differences between the wilderness in which we evolved and the modern world in which we live. We feel the consequences every day. Here are ten.
1. Our cells are weird chimeras
Perhaps a billion years ago, a single-celled organism arose that would ultimately give rise to all of the plants and animals on Earth, including us. This ancestor was the result of a merging: one cell swallowed, imperfectly, another cell. The predator provided the outsides, the nucleus and most of the rest of the chimera. The prey became the mitochondrion, the cellular organ that produces energy. Most of the time, this ancient symbiosis proceeds amicably. But every so often, our mitochondria and their surrounding cells fight. The result is diseases, such as mitochondrial myopathies (a range of muscle diseases) or Leigh’s disease (which affects the central nervous system).
2. Hiccups
The first air-breathing fish and amphibians extracted oxygen using gills when in the water and primitive lungs when on land—and to do so, they had to be able to close the glottis, or entryway to the lungs, when underwater. Importantly, the entryway (or glottis) to the lungs could be closed. When underwater, the animals pushed water past their gills while simultaneously pushing the glottis down. We descendants of these animals were left with vestiges of their history, including the hiccup. In hiccupping, we use ancient muscles to quickly close the glottis while sucking in (albeit air, not water). Hiccups no longer serve a function, but they persist without causing us harm—aside from frustration and occasional embarrassment. One of the reasons it is so difficult to stop hiccupping is that the entire process is controlled by a part of our brain that evolved long before consciousness, and so try as you might, you cannot think hiccups away.
3. Backaches
The backs of vertebrates evolved as a kind of horizontal pole under which guts were slung. It was arched in the way a bridge might be arched, to support weight. Then, for reasons anthropologists debate long into the night, our hominid ancestors stood upright, which was the bodily equivalent of tipping a bridge on end. Standing on hind legs offered advantages—seeing long distances, for one, or freeing the hands to do other things—but it also turned our backs from an arched bridge to an S shape. The letter S, for all its beauty, is not meant to support weight and so our backs fail, consistently and painfully.
4. Unsupported intestines
Once we stood upright, our intestines hung down instead of being cradled by our stomach muscles. In this new position, our innards were not as well supported as they had been in our quadrupedal ancestors. The guts sat atop a hodgepodge of internal parts, including, in men, the cavities in the body wall through which the scrotum and its nerves descend during the first year of life. Every so often, our intestines find their way through these holes—in the way that noodles sneak out of a sieve—forming an inguinal hernia.
5. Choking
In most animals, the trachea (the passage for air) and the esophagus (the passage for food) are oriented such that the esophagus is below the trachea. In a cat's throat, for example, the two tubes run roughly horizontal and parallel to each other before heading on to the stomach and lung, respectively. In this configuration, gravity tends to push food down toward the lower esophagus. Not so in humans. Modifications of the trachea to allow speech pushed the trachea and esophagus further down the throat to make way. Simultaneously, our upright posture put the trachea and esophagus in a near-vertical orientation. Together these changes leave falling food or water about a 50-50 chance of falling in the “wrong tube.” As a consequence, in those moments in which the epiglottis does not have time to cover the trachea, we choke. We might be said to choke on our success. Monkeys suffer the same fate only rarely, but then again they can’t sing or dance. Then again, neither can I.
Subscribe now for more of Smithsonian's coverage on history, science and nature.
Related topics: Evolution
| Tweet | Digg |






Comments (216)
+ View All Comments
Dawn's comments are very revealing. Maybe we are closer to a species divergence than we realize. The last time this happened was 200,000 years ago with the emergence of homo sapiens. It cannot be a coincidence that this was also a time of huge climate change. May I suggest homo scientiens and homo superstitiens?
Posted by Upright N. Grateful on January 30,2012 | 08:49 AM
I think Dawn's comment is very revealing. Perhaps we are closer to a species divergence than we realize. The last time this happened was 200,000 years ago, again accompanied by a major climate change. I don't think we can ignore the coincidence. Can I suggest homo scientifiens and homo superstitiens?
Posted by Upright N. Grateful on January 29,2012 | 11:41 AM
You guys are fighting for nothing i believe God made us! I think that the theory of evolutions is fasinating!BUT Get this God made us i am with John Gilbert
Posted by Selena on January 24,2012 | 10:45 PM
Oh brother! What an unscientific load of rubbish.
Posted by Cass on November 28,2011 | 02:54 AM
The last part of #2 is false. I routinely suppress hiccups by thought alone. It has become almost automatic; by the time I notice I have hiccups, I have usually suppressed them already.
Posted by Andrew on November 25,2011 | 07:26 PM
I think this article is a joke for real! it is a stretched to believe any of this. My question when I see the picture along with the article is, what is the next step? Why are we not evolving? of course you would say that our enviroment is inhibiting us, but really if we were evolving to our bodies would be crippled, from a bridge shaped spine as the article suggested to a S and then it would continue on to a C, is that not correct?? and what happens to our skin after we have lost our hairy exterior??? I guess you would say elemental damage like sunburn or cancer. Why would our body not evolve with another protective layer? Just a thought
Posted by Dawn on November 24,2011 | 01:01 PM
I am fond of the theory that we have descended from aquatic apes who lived near and utilized streams, lakes, and seas. Why do we stand on two legs? To see a greater distance in a savanna means such primates could also be seen by predators from greater distances. Moving about in water on two legs to keep their heads above water sounds possible to me.
Articles on the "Aquatic Ape Hypothesis" can be found by searching...
Posted by G. Dempsey on November 20,2011 | 04:08 AM
To Coert,
To what Darwinian stereotype that evolution promotes racism are you speaking of. This idea is an aspect of social darwinism and had nothing to do with Darwin or human evolution.
Most scientist in this field would agree that the differences between different races are so minute that they are almost irrelevant to any real discussion beyond identifying migration patterns.
p.s. If this picture represents a timescale then only the last figure would be a member of our species. The others would not even be subject to the term race.
Posted by Seth on November 17,2011 | 07:15 PM
I really enjoyed reading this article. Lovely, humourously told science, is a pleasure to read.
Interesting point about the 1930s nutritional research that a reader mentioned in relation to wisdom teeth. That was the one I hadn't heard before in the article, which leads me down the garden path of further enquiry to confirm or deny... Maybe I should've been a scientist. Maybe I still can be. Maybe we all are. Big brains are wonderful.
Posted by Lyn-K Saunders on August 24,2011 | 07:35 PM
Hrmm I have to say that I'm a little skeptical of #8. I thought that there are archaelogical finds of recent ancestor skulls full of healthy, straight teeth, without occlusion. I perceive today's epidemic of malocclusion as having modern malnutrition as the cause, not evolution. Shrug.
Posted by Ed on August 22,2011 | 10:48 PM
I believe #8 is flawed. If you read Nutrition and Physical Degeneration by Weston A Price, you see that isolated peoples living on traditional diets in the 1930s had fully formed dental arches, no cavities and plenty of room for their wisdom teeth. Their modernized neighbors had malformed dental arches, misaligned teeth and cavities galore. It is our modern diet that makes the extraction of wisdom teeth so often necessary, not evolution.
Posted by Ben on August 22,2011 | 11:28 AM
"survival of the sickest"
Is a book that goes into how many of our diseases have there roots in positive adaptations.
Posted by alex on August 21,2011 | 04:49 PM
I didn't realize I was such a mess until I read this article! But seriously, even with all of our flaws and cornucopia of physical problems, we are as a species the greatest problem solvers in history. We will eventually figure out how to solve what ails us, regardless of the discomfort. And sure, the world seems like it's in a bit of a mess, and perhaps it is, but there are those pockets of brilliance and goodness that really aren't as isolated as we sometimes think and that should give us cause to hope. As a species, we're going places. And that's always something to anticipate. Nice article.
Posted by Brian on May 25,2011 | 12:24 PM
Commenting on the illistration is completely irrelevant. This article has absolutely nothing to do with race, it has to do with human evolution as a whole. The illistration is obviously meant to depict HUMANS, not the white race. To say that it's racist because the most evoled figure in the illistration appears to be cacausian is ridiculous. It's an example. Does Honda advertise new cars in every single color they produce? No. Because they advertise the MODEL of the car, not the color.
If you want to draw up the new evolutionary illistration that depicts every single race evoling through time be my guest. But it sure will take you a while.
Awesome Article.
Posted by Ry Keel on May 13,2011 | 03:33 PM
+ View All Comments